I am so 50/50 with all of this.
On one hand I still want United to stand by Moyes but as I mentioned in a post above, that's mainly due to the fact that I don't want to do what every other club would do, and that's sack a manager as a short term solution, due to some terrible results, rather than me believing he is the right person for the job.
The sheer arrogance of our club to think they could just hand pick a person, give him a 6 year contract, and think he will have the same influence as Sir Alex, just because we are United, and because Alex himself thought so, is ludicrous.
People saying that sacking managers is not the United way is nonsense. For 20 years we had no reason to sack a manager as we were winning titles, cups, trophies every year. If Fergie had of dropped to 7th on the table, played dour football and showed little sign of improvement then after a while, he too would have been in the gun. We can't use the success of our previous regime as a reason to continue with the new regime; It's actually cutting off your nose to spite your face if we stick with a manager who is clearly not cut out for this job.
Simple fact is; If Moyes left United what job would he go to next? It certainly wouldn't be a big European club, it wouldn't even be a top 6 English club. The manager of United should be sought after, should be well credentialed and should be a bright innovative manager who is respected world wide, not dour and defensive minded.
We missed the boat with Mourinho. No doubt about it. We can't afford to miss the boat again if a Klopp or someone of similar ilk becomes available.
I hate the short termism as much as the next person, but football is a short term game now. Better to make a change and take a risk, than continue with what clearly isn't working, which costs us long term dollars, sponsors, players, brand damage.