Xtratime Community banner

was football better in the 90s or is it better in the present day

  • 90s

    Votes: 14 45%
  • present day

    Votes: 4 13%
  • Any other era

    Votes: 3 9.7%
  • Fuçk eras enjoy what you have

    Votes: 10 32%

the 90s was the golden era of football, will we ever get another one soon?

5K views 52 replies 26 participants last post by  Andy Christ  
#1 ·
to many the 1990s is the peak of football, there was more competitiveness between the various European leagues of the era, the 1994 and 1998 world were considered by many to be the greatest tournaments of all time, the EPL was still in it's infancy and not taken over by petrodollars and it also featured the first 16 team European championship, hosted in the home of association football.

The decade also gave us great stars such as Baggio, Klinsmann, Ronaldo, Zidane, Maldini (in his prime), Batistuta, Boban, Keane, Bergkamp, Ortega, Scholes, Zanetti, Giggs, Beckham, Owen, Rivaldo, Roberto Carlos, Weah, Figo, Shearer, Sammer, Stoichkov, Romario and the list goes on..

The game was also played with more emphasis on rough tackles unlike the more "weaker" version of the sport today, in which fouls are called for every little thing and yellows /red cards fly out like santa giving presents on Christmas day. Seeing Scholes being so crucial to United, despite his age has made me think that younger players simply don't cut it nowadays.

Main question is: will we ever get such a great era again or will the new breed of players continue to disappoint with their theatrics and more non-contact (thanks to stupid referee's of course) football style?
 
#10 ·
EPL was shit, that may count as a plus to some.

As for competitiveness between different leagues, Serie A enjoyed a dominance never seen before or since (with the possible exception of English 1. Div. in late the '70s and early 80s).
how so? From 1997-1999 all the Uefa Champions league winners were from Germany, England and Spain. And throughout the span of the whole decade, 7 of the European Cup/Champions league winners were not Italian.

in 1999 Dynamo Kiev also made the semi-finals of the Champions league and were 1 goal away from reaching the final IIRC. We won't see such competitiveness again from another EE side for a long time, unless Anzhi starts buying more "star players".
 
#15 ·
I agree that romario,ronaldo,zidane and baggio were outstanding and as great as cristiano and messi(maybe messi would surpass all them on the future).the problem is that you are take in consideration a whole decade. in the early 90´s we had romario and baggio peaks. after 95 we saw ronaldo and zidane peaks. also, maybe zidane should be remember as a player of the 2000 decade. he was amazing from 2000 until 2004 and had a great moment in WC2006.so, we should compare the 90´s and the 2000´s. the 90´s had ronaldo,romario,baggio,laudrup,stoichkov,maldini, weah,etc. and the 2000´s had zidane, ronaldinho,henry,eto´o,kaka,cristiano,messi,buffon,etc. so, I believe football is not getting worse.
 
#20 ·
Green Beret, I think you are confusing or not seeing the 90's era for what it was. Yes a bunch of legends played during the 90s but they were mainly legendary because of their International play. The 1994 and 1998 WC's were legendary, most of the players you have named became legendary because of the Euro and World Cup competitions during the 1990s. In reality, these guys never lived up to the same World Class level of play at the club level. Most of them bounced around from relevant to irrelevant clubs. The EPL was garbage, the Seria A dominated UEFA because they had the most money at the time. World Wide, outside of Europe, the North American and South American leagues were crap. Argentina and Brasil had pretty bad leagues during the 90s mostly because every good player was going to Europe and a wide majority failed or took a long time to adjust.

While the 21st century, lets just take 2000-2010 was much more competitive on a global level. Boca Juniors and River Plate came back to prominence as well as various Brasilian teams, not to mention the rise of the MLS in America and the Arabian leagues taking off. It also saw a great generation of legends, most established at one or two clubs and quit moving around so much as in the 90s. Yes the international competitions haven't been as exciting but that's because there is so much parity now internationally. South Korea, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Chile and Colombia back on the rise. Just look at how good across the board most national teams in Europe are now... there's good players at every club.

Yet people are distracted by the teams that spend so much money these days like Chelsea, Man City, Juventus, Barca, Madrid....

but in reality you would struggle to find a 90s Man U team that could beat a Man U team of the last decade, same with Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Barca, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich... only the Italian teams of the 90s are arguably better than the Italian teams of the last decade
 
#31 ·
u guys are retarded, I'm not saying that maradona was crap, but that he was the only superstar player in the 80s - nobody else could challange him. Whereas if he played in the 90s, in his prime, his dominance would of been challanged by pre-injury R9, Romario, Zidane etc...
 
#33 ·
u guys are retarded, I'm not saying that maradona was crap, but that he was the only superstar player in the 80s - nobody else could challange him. Whereas if he played in the 90s, in his prime, his dominance would of been challanged by pre-injury R9, Romario, Zidane etc...
you are really retarded if you think people reacted your post for that. Really have you heard about Zico or Platini or Van Basten or Baresi etc etc...
 
#37 ·
As for Scholes having an impact still. United are going through a down period (they have high standards), but it's hardly uncommon to see a formerly tenacious midfielder switch to a more subtle role as he gets older. For '90s examples see Mathias Sammer, Loddar, Mihajlovic, Hierro, etc.
 
#38 ·
you guys really got to stop making retarded assumptions. :palm:

Of course I know about the likes of Van Bastan, Platini and Baresi in the 80s, but I'm not comparing the 90s with that decade, my main comparision is with the state of football in the present day.

Also, what I said before was that Maradona is seen as the undisputed king of football in the 80s, heck he was one of the best players ever. He was so good that he was held in much higher regard then the likes of Van Basten, despite Marco being a very great player - whereas in the 90s, the likes of Zidane and pre-injury R9 were more neck and neck in terms of "who is the best player today".
 
#40 ·
[Zico seems to be becoming more and more of a Sir Bobby Charlton, Johnny Haynes, or Fritz Walter of Brazilian/world football: fans/people who never saw them in action don't understand what dominant and phenomenal players that they were and then tend to under-apprectiate them as a result of IMHO.]
 
#42 ·
Yes indeed growing up in the 90's was very special for football,Baggio,Zola,MVB,Signori,Gullit,Giggs,Mancini,Matthaus,Romario,Ronaldo the list goes on:proud:.

I can't really personally or don't want to compare era's but the 90's was indeed very sepcial just like other decades were for obvious reasons:thumbsup::smileani:.