He'll play one of the midfield roles. De Jong will probably be sold if Man Utd offers 15 million euros.Milan Channel says Inzaghi will play 4-3-3 next season. What do you guys think will happen to Honda if that is true? Will we sell him or move him to midfield?
Say what :eekani:honda sud be our 12th man I wud rather see birsa , muntari , noce in midfield rather than honda stumbling n being outrun by 38 yr grandpa totti.
You would have sold De Jong for 15 million if Montolivo was fit? And who would you replace De Jong with? That idea would leave us hopelessly shortchanged in midfield.honda sud be our 12th man I wud rather see birsa , muntari , noce in midfield rather than honda stumbling n being outrun by 38 yr grandpa totti. watched japan thought they were beyond woeful maybe thy sud make robot play instead of themselves
I wud have sold de jong for 15m if monty was fit
de jong is 29 yrs old n as good as he has at most 2-3 season in top level as his play depends on physicality which will degrade eventuallyYou would have sold De Jong for 15 million if Montolivo was fit? And who would you replace De Jong with? That idea would leave us hopelessly shortchanged in midfield.
Their defence suffered becoz of their midfielders n defenders not beingNobody could help Japan's cruddy defense though. Zaccheroni failed miserably in inspiring the team. And when Colombia played against Japan, it was all over for them.
Even in his assist u can see that his speed is quite woeful n requires quite a lot of time which he wudnt be given against good teams.And your ideas on Honda are interesting, but wrong. Honda was one of Japan's better players and had a goal and assist, and was involved in much of their attacking play.
Van Bommel played well into his mid 30s and effectively too. So that's not a good call to make. You can't sell De Jong and have NO ONE to replace him with. And no, Montolivo is NOT a replacement for De Jong because Montolivo is ALSO 29.de jong is 29 yrs old n as good as he has at most 2-3 season in top level as his play depends on physicality which will degrade eventually
n adding 6m frm terminating essien's contract plus 6m from de jong's salary plus hypothetical 15m transfer fee sud be 27 m i.e. enough for 2 top quality midfielders upgrade
No. I don't agree with this at all. If you watched Japan, you can see he did track back. And he didn't have the pace, because he didn't play with consistency the prior season. I did see him track back for Japan. Japan's defensive fragilities don't have anything to do with Honda though. That goes back on their defenders. So I think you're quite mistaken.Same is case for honda even if he has good vision n shots he doesnt has legs n physicality enough to track back , can be easily dispossessed . That becomes a liablity in top class match.he wud be a failure in midfield n as a winger , I just see him as a bench material that wud be used when we need to fall back for 4-3-1-2.
I thnk he wud be used against low positioned teams where game is played in slow paced .
No. His speed looks find to me, and not woeful. Don't really know what you saw or if you were watching the right player. The Japanese team was woeful. But again that's not down to Honda, who was one of their better players.Even in his assist u can see that his speed is quite woeful n requires quite a lot of time which he wudnt be given against good teams.
The japanish team was a joke look how easily ivory costa team manhandled them n greece played with 10 man for last 60 min was never threatened
:eekani::eekani:And he didn't have the pace, because he didn't play with consistency the prior season.
No. His speed looks find to me, and not woeful. Don't really know what you saw or if you were watching the right player. The Japanese team was woeful. But again that's not down to Honda, who was one of their better players.
You seem to post figures that don't really add up. A rate of 2.7 per match? Pulled out of thin air it seems. He was one of Japan's better performers, and still did pretty well. His speed is enough. And it's not like the Serie A is known for its speedy play anyways. His speed was enough for CSKA and that league has fast players. So your point is pretty void.:eekani::eekani:
WE both know his speed is not enough n he was dispossesed at rate 2.7 per match playing against colombia B team , ivory costa n greece with 10 men than how cud he be adjusted in serie-a as a midfielder n winger .
no one is required to replace honda with when he is not even starterYou seem to post figures that don't really add up. A rate of 2.7 per match? Pulled out of thin air it seems. He was one of Japan's better performers, and still did pretty well. His speed is enough. And it's not like the Serie A is known for its speedy play anyways. His speed was enough for CSKA and that league has fast players. So your point is pretty void.
I love it when someone posts they want Honda gone, and also De Jong... but don't have the slightest idea on WHOM to replace them with.
This isn't true at all. You are just exaggerating greatly about a player you inherently don't like and probably haven't seen much of. And Japanish? You mean Japanese. Honda started to do well for Milan prior to having an injury, and he was out of form. And no, playing in the Serie A does not require speed. Maybe physicality to an extent, but not speed.no one is required to replace honda with when he is not even starter
check out honda's statistics n u will find his records n that aside japanish team was built around him n him being played in his preffered pos , well rested n playing against small teams n still he was unimpressive . for me he is just overrated n even playing in serie-a requires speed n physicality that he lacks . lets see in coming season whether he proves something or not.
I think there were rumours Galliani was trying to include Rami& Menez in the dealif we can lower kondogbia's price by including honda, im all for it.