Ok, we pretty much know the QF teams.
Who will go on to win it?
Who will go on to win it?
We will battleling for the Serie A title, Chelsea have already won the title whilst Inter are no longer contenders, it must be one of the 2 :stuckup:Che said:AC Milan has to be the odd on Fav's they been there before and they have a very balanced squad.
I think the dark horse can be Bayern Munich!
O Glorioso said:I think you should have waited until Porto and Inter face each other but oh well... Chelsea are gonna win it.
Interesting how you say Milan is the best team in the world when they had to rely on a lucky goal to beat Inter in the last derby? When Inter dominated the entire game? When Inter should have scored, and any normal day would have put a goal in? Based on your statistics Inter is then the second best in the world. B/c we are not far behind Milan based on the two ties this year.Andr3w said:Right now Milan is the best team in the world.
Please, just because Milan beat a shabby Man Utd side doesn't mean they're the best. Chelsea beat a very good Barcalona side which was thought to be the best at the moment, so I think it would be right to give that title to them at the moment.Andr3w said:I think Chelsea is overated as well, and if they come up against a team like Milan or Juventus they will meet their match. I also doubt Inter will win the CL as well.
Right now Milan is the best team in the world.
Milan is better than Chelsea for these reasons:O Glorioso said:Please, just because Milan beat a shabby Man Utd side doesn't mean they're the best. Chelsea beat a very good Barcalona side which was thought to be the best at the moment, so I think it would be right to give that title to them at the moment.
Andr3w said:Milan is better than Chelsea for these reasons:
Milan is very much like Barcelona in terms of controlling the match. With players like Pirlo, Seedorf, and Kaka, they can have much of the posession and control the match, sort of like Barca.
The difference between Barca and Milan is that the latter is never exposed at the back and usually has players behind the ball. Barca does not have a stacked defense, as Puyol, Oleguer, and Belletti do not match up with Nesta, Stam, and Cafu. The individual talent of Milan's defense is far superior to Barca.
Now, since Milan is rarely caught out at the back Chelsea will have a tougher time striking on the counter attack, something the latter does very well. Chelsea's first three goals against Barca were all on the counter-attack, some of which was due to errors by Barca defenders. Milan will not be as loose at the back as Barca, so Chelsea will have a difficult time scoring IMO.
Milan can hold posession and have the players to make you pay, especially when Shevchenko comes back into the fold. I just do not think Chelsea will have an easy time scoring against Milan, and if the latter sits back like they do on the one-goal lead Chelsea will be in trouble. The latter's attack is no better than Man United's for that matter, however Milan is strong in all positions and know how to control a match.
No, Forlan scored shit loads of goals in La Liga, but not hit the post against MILAN.Pulsar36 said:If I recall that Forlan and Rooney had two good chances set up by Cristiano Ronaldo on a counterattack against a Milan backline and they were saved by a post or something
Genjuro said:No, Forlan scored shit loads of goals in La Liga, but not hit the post against MILAN.![]()
I like your avatarPulsar36 said:Hmm I'm pretty sure someone hit the damn post or went just wide in the first leg. And boht chances for Man Utd were from counters, thats my main point...milan left a lot of space open at the back
Thanks I made it myself.O Glorioso said:I like your avatar![]()