In all honesty I believe some of the criticism the italian teams have recieved is unjust.
If there's anyone to blame, it's the whole ChL - IMO this years edition represents the lowest level of competetivness in years. Let me elaborate...
You critcize Milan, Juve and Inter, and claim they have no place in the semi's... just because they made it past their QF opponents in a very ugly manner. OK, but that's just the QF's. And let's face it, what exactly were they suppose to do?
Juve's opponent was a very poor team - Barcelona. The only reason they had any trouble with them, is that Barca seemed to have hit a season high in the past 2 weeks, and thus made life difficult for Juve... but in general Barca is simply an extremely poor team, and the mere fact they made it to this stage of the competition is definite proof at how poor their opposition had to be. It's almost funny people avoid this harsh truth - but what does Barca's succes in Europe say about the level of the ChL, when that team is fighting relegation in what is commonly acclaimed as the "best" league in Europe. Don't sell me any of the "two teams theory" - it can be true to a certain extent, but doesn't mask the disproportion between "best streak in the ChL", and "fighting relegation in the Primera".
Same goes for Milan - no offense to Ajax, I liked their ambitious charge of the youth... but in the end, it took some big luck, but most of all, experience, and voila - sufficient to somehow advance.
Inter is by far the poorest of the three italian teams, but their challenge against Valencia (which has been in a huge crisis recently) was decided in their favor, because the italians had one asset - poachers. Vieri, Crespo, both top 10 strikers in the world. Valencia was not only off form (although you wouldn't know it, watching how they aniahlated the non-existing Inter midfield), but doesn't have anyone up front to even come close to claiming a spot in the top 30 strikers in the world. And that's all it took. Not much.
All in all, the italians' didn't make it pretty in the QF's, but they did just enough. Their opponents rose to the top of their game, but it was still not enough.
IMO, this whole ChL is a case of the big leagues (England, Spain, Italy) supplying teams in abundance, some are top class, others are just medicore, but even that medicore level is more than enough for what "the rest of Europe" threw at them this year. Maybe it's the economic crisis that has hit the lesser leagues in particular? I dunno, but in the end we have two semifinal legs, and as much as we might wanna evade the reality - these are not the strongest teams the ChL has seen at this stage (big names yes, but in terms of abilities, these teams [and we know I mean the italians] are hardly anything special). Problem is there wasn't exactly too many alternatives to contest the italians. Barca advancing would be laughable (not based on their 2nd leg performance v Juve, but in general, as a team they deserve their 12th position in the Primera, and not a ChL semifinal birth). Valencia are hardly world class material of late. And Ajax were just too young.
Either one of those 3 eliminated teams wouldn't have been a huge improvement to the already medicore line-up of the semifinals. The only thing they would've offered would've been diversity, and that diversity would act as good cover for the reality of this being a simply poor edition of the ChL:lala:
Big shame ManU encountered Real so early, because they were easily worthy of the nobility of being in the semi's.
Now, going back to the subject at hand - the italians hardly deserve a spot amongst the top 4 teams on the continent, but they made it here, and it's not like Europe made them work that hard. You can't blame them for taking advantage of the fact "the rest" was just as medicore as they were.
[And we all know the harsh truth: If two teams are equal, the Italians will always find a way to advance.]
:irritate: