says it all ,.Incredible .Even when we have spent large amounts of money in recent times ,combining houllier,evans and benitez over a 10 year period is still less than 3 years of the russian .
liver bird
says it all ,.Incredible .Even when we have spent large amounts of money in recent times ,combining houllier,evans and benitez over a 10 year period is still less than 3 years of the russian .
agree with 7aint9, only Makelele has been worth what they payed for him, all th rest have been good but not to what they payed for them.
This is an interesting page with all our transfers since Shankly.
http://www.thisisanfield.com/content.php?page_id=215
Bob Paisley probably got more bang for his buck concerning transfers then any other manager in the history of the game.
Hodgson was probably his only major mistake and even players like Sheedy and Oggy who didn't make it here became top players elsewhere.
http://www.thisisanfield.com/content.php?page_id=215
Bob Paisley probably got more bang for his buck concerning transfers then any other manager in the history of the game.
Hodgson was probably his only major mistake and even players like Sheedy and Oggy who didn't make it here became top players elsewhere.
The interesting thing is that half the money Liverpool spend in their history was under Houllier(one of my fav coaches because of 94 French team ). Wow the wonders Rafa has done with so little cash still he needs a top stricker so we can add at least 10 million pounds this summer.
). Wow the wonders Rafa has done with so little cash still he needs a top stricker so we can add at least 10 million pounds this summer.
[QUOTE
says it all ,.Incredible .Even when we have spent large amounts of money in recent times ,combining houllier,evans and benitez over a 10 year period is still less than 3 years of the russian .[/QUOTE]
Did you count inflation and other economical tricks as well, or do you talk crap, as always?
says it all ,.Incredible .Even when we have spent large amounts of money in recent times ,combining houllier,evans and benitez over a 10 year period is still less than 3 years of the russian .[/QUOTE]
Did you count inflation and other economical tricks as well, or do you talk crap, as always?
yeah 125 over 6 seasons equate to about £20m a season :eekani: which is still a lot, but he did revitalise the team and modernise the club and recoup around £70m from sales.
yeah 20m is a good base, i mean a lot of european clubs use about 30m euro's so we are good in that department, the problem is spending a huge amount on one player, as that eats up the transfer kitty. But even in our pomp under Paisley we were never massive spenders, united, spurs always have always payed bigger, we've always had the hallmark of buying intelligently either youth or talented unproven potential.
Few European clubs spend £20mln each and every summer, let alone £30.
Now, granted, I'm not up on English football, but I genuinly struggle to think of any signings Houllier made. There was Hyppia, but unless I'm mistaken, he was no more than 3 or 4 million? And Dudek I remember as well. But considering the spine was there already--Carragher, Owen, Gerrard, Fowler--I find it flabbergasting that he was able to burn that amount of cash.
Now, granted, I'm not up on English football, but I genuinly struggle to think of any signings Houllier made. There was Hyppia, but unless I'm mistaken, he was no more than 3 or 4 million? And Dudek I remember as well. But considering the spine was there already--Carragher, Owen, Gerrard, Fowler--I find it flabbergasting that he was able to burn that amount of cash.
Jern Lizardhous said:
heskey wasn't failure of cisse proportions ,he had a great first season and was a good foil for michael owen for a few years.Diouf what a horrendous price tag.
it quite rightly in the end got houllier the sack ,but then it didn't stop him getting another great job at lyon:howler:
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
-
?
