Xtratime Community banner
61 - 80 of 124 Posts
That's the main point. He wasn't proven in the EPL and it's just an assumption that the injury is the main reason why he's performed averagely so far. Plenty of strikers have started the EPL very well e.g. Zaki but in the end their quality or lack of, showed. Who's to say that wouldn't have happened with Eduardo? and looking at how he's playing presently that wouldn't be a far fetched idea.

I understand he's highly rated in Croatia but then so was Igor Biscan.
Biscan is rated rightly, he is a solid player. He also played well for Liverpool when given the chance.
 
Rarely if ever in the era of modern medicine anyone loses his limb because it was broken. He needed urgent surgery, but he wasn't about to lose the foot. Stop dramatizing.

..and mechanism of injury has nothing to do with how urgent one needs the surgery. It all depends whether an artery was injured by the broken bone or not.
 
Cisse suffered TWO injuries like Eduardo's. He came back fine.
Eduardo needs time and games to show his talent. Perhaps he is and was as good as he's showing now. Don't know why people are assuming he was an awesome striker made shite by the injury.
:confused:

no, not really. I'm sure his career would have turned out much better if not for the injury. The guy went from playing for Liverpool before the injury to playing at Sunderland after it.
 
Image


it was a horrific injury tbh, and it can be argued that he could have progressed more as a footballer if not for the injury.
 
:confused:

no, not really. I'm sure his career would have turned out much better if not for the injury. The guy went from playing for Liverpool before the injury to playing at Sunderland after it.
He was a headless chicken before his injuries and he was a headless chicken after.

That's why he ended up at Sunderland and he's the reason why i don't buy into the idea Eduardo has been outwardly affected by the injury.
 
Discussion starter · #70 ·
Stop comparing Eduardo to Cisse as footballers. Those who doubt Eduardo's talent must not have seen him play much before the injury. That game against Everton I mentioned showed what a fantastic striker he could be.

As far as Cisse's injuries go I'm sure breaking a leg would set anyone back. Mentally and physically. Maybe Cisse was less affected physically as he's naturally more fit.

I brought up Eduardo as an example of a technically gifted player whose talents have suffered terribly from a rash lunge by a defender. I hope he can get back to his best and show the sharpness he used to, but watching that Chelsea game he didn't seem to resemble the player he was before. Maybe its too soon to judge and he still has a chance of recovery but the point is these things should not happen in football. Blaming Taylor isn't exactly fair either, a number of other defenders could have done that. In the heat of battle its difficult to draw the line between what is reckless and what is fair, and that's where FIFA's job as the rule making body comes in. If FIFA encourages stricter sliding tackle rules and such, in time we'd see fair-minded defensive play from defenders.

I had two reasons for the original post. This was the first. The second was to look at football in general and encourage teams to play rather than be anally retentive scared to lose bitches. So the millions of dollars spent by the Liverpools, Chelseas, Inters, etc actually produce dividends of entertaining football. Since winning matters so much in football, this will only happen if the laws make it difficult for teams to do so by being catenaccio bitches. I am no Barca fan but what they did last season was a modern marvel. Its just so incredibly difficult for teams to play with the creative spirit that a Barca display and still win things. FIFA should be doing more to reward style over stymying.
 
Give an extra point for every goal scored over 3 then. That should work.

Eduardo is fine physically. If he's mentally weak, that's his problem.
 
Discussion starter · #77 ·
Only if after you married the guy who broke it.

Stop arguing for the heck of it. You guys sound like you actually enjoy it when a team gets stopped after 10 great passes by a defender deliberately clipping an ankle.
 
I'm not arguing for the sake of it. I'm arguing that football has always been a man's game and should remain so.
 
Eduardo injury from pure medical point of view has nothing to do with his poor performance now.
Not true, Eduardo's injury wasn't just a broken leg, it was compound fractures of the shin, fibula and many ankle bones.

The fusion of small fragmented bones always take longer than normal due to poor circulation in the area, making the healing and pain last much longer. There is almost no chance that an ankle break of his nature regains the free movement range that he had previously as there is also joint, soft tissue and even possible vascular injury as well.

Eduardo was very close, according to all accounts, of losing his foot. Had it not been for the quick actions of the trainers on site that immediately put a vacuum "cast" that is placed at low temps and the emergency surgery, he could have had his foot amputated.

The bones will heal but the vascular network, soft tissues and nerve endings will almost certainly never heal.
 
Rarely if ever in the era of modern medicine anyone loses his limb because it was broken. He needed urgent surgery, but he wasn't about to lose the foot. Stop dramatizing.
Simply not true. From a normal break, I agree but Eduardo's was nothing but a normal break.
 
61 - 80 of 124 Posts