Xtratime Community banner
21 - 40 of 251 Posts
I've heard Granero is officially signed back and Parejo will go there ON LOAN.
 
It will be a mistake to sell Parejo, even with a buy back option. It's obvious Parejo is good enough to succeed here, so for me there are two options:
1. Keeping him and giving him enough minutes so he can develop his game. (my preferred option)
2. Loaning him out.

What's the point selling him for 3m with a buy back option for 4m when it's obvious we'll bring him back? This way we lose 1m on our own player.

We payed 1.5m to loan Faubert and it seems we also pay teams to take our players away... Osasuna made 1m on Javi Garcia that way, Getafe earned money on DLR and Granero, and Almeria enjoyed Negredo for 2 great seasons and enjoyed 2m profit. All this teams would be happy to get our players on a loan too. I don't know why we're keeping this trend of selling our prospects cheap and buying them later for a higher price. Mijatovic introduce this procedure and we should rethink this policy. What's so bad with a simple loan?
 
im not sure Green but there has to be something positive about it. ive been thinking about it whilst reading your post and id imagine it could be one of a few things.

1) when they buy him he is theirs. so unlike a loan theyre more obligated to play him. they are buying him in the hope that who knows, maybe theyll be allowed to keep him. gives teh player more confidence.

2) we dont have to worry about his wages. this i dont think is true as getafe wont be able to match the wages we're paying him so we'll still pay most of it.

3) maybe some sort of law, theres gotta be something obvious that we're all missing.
 
I've heard Granero is officially signed back and Parejo will go there ON LOAN.
Oh Well... I'm glad to see Granero coming back, but disappointed to see Parejo moving out. At least it's on a loan... It's good for Parejo to gain minutes but i wished he could get them here. For me he's already a better option than Gago, Guti and Sneijder.

Why can't a homegrown player make the jump from our youth ranks into the team without moving outside first? We should start trusting our youngsters more.
 
It will be a mistake to sell Parejo, even with a buy back option. It's obvious Parejo is good enough to succeed here, so for me there are two options:
1. Keeping him and giving him enough minutes so he can develop his game. (my preferred option)
2. Loaning him out.

What's the point selling him for 3m with a buy back option for 4m when it's obvious we'll bring him back? This way we lose 1m on our own player.

We payed 1.5m to loan Faubert and it seems we also pay teams to take our players away... Osasuna made 1m on Javi Garcia that way, Getafe earned money on DLR and Granero, and Almeria enjoyed Negredo for 2 great seasons and enjoyed 2m profit. All this teams would be happy to get our players on a loan too. I don't know why we're keeping this trend of selling our prospects cheap and buying them later for a higher price. Mijatovic introduce this procedure and we should rethink this policy. What's so bad with a simple loan?
well we pay his wages when the player is loaned. Also I think we value the players more when we sold them with buy-back option. You know the idiom, what doesnt cost anything isnt worth anything? Sad but true. Im actually glad Mijatovic introduced this option so we can have players back for cheap although their value is higher, even though we could have had them for nothing... can you follow me? :D
 
1) when they buy him he is theirs. so unlike a loan theyre more obligated to play him. they are buying him in the hope that who knows, maybe theyll be allowed to keep him. gives teh player more confidence.

2) we dont have to worry about his wages. this i dont think is true as getafe wont be able to match the wages we're paying him so we'll still pay most of it.

3) maybe some sort of law, theres gotta be something obvious that we're all missing.
1) True, but just as with a loan, the team know they could keep hold on the player only if he isn't succeeding there. If he's doing great we'll buy him back, no illusion there.

2) This players are young and don't earn galactico salary, most teams can afford their salaries. It's not like when we loaned Morientes to Monaco and still payed most of his salary just to see him knocking us out of the CL...

3) Then why are we the only club using this policy? Or we aren't?
 
well we pay his wages when the player is loaned. Also I think we value the players more when we sold them with buy-back option. You know the idiom, what doesnt cost anything isnt worth anything? Sad but true. Im actually glad Mijatovic introduced this option so we can have players back for cheap although their value is higher, even though we could have had them for nothing... can you follow me? :D
LOL i get your logic. But it's like you have a glass full of wine, you spill half of it, and then look happily on the half full glass because you know it can also be empty...

Is that make any sense? :googly:
 
im happy granero be back ,but no way we lose parejo

agree with green , why cant he get time in RM when he is better than those so called stars. yes i mean gago and sneijder

and his wage is tooooooo low to be a question of club like RM ,so why they must sell not loan ? anything sucks
 
since the beginging of the summer they club didnt want to keep VdV and that didnt change even after yesterday; but what most likely have changed is the status of Sneijder in the team, i guess the club doesnt see him fit into the project anymore and they beleive that Granero would fit the team better as a sub for kaka...
 
LOL i get your logic. But it's like you have a glass full of wine, you spill half of it, and then look happily on the half full glass because you know it can also be empty...

Is that make any sense? :googly:
LOL yeah I know what you mean. Well maybe its to have money for the here and now to finance other transfers (short sighted view) but leave a door open to return the player (usually his value raises, its more money to pay, but for the value its low). And we will only buy back players that have proven.

The other thing is Im not firm with the loaning rules, how many times, how long you can loan a player to the same team? Usually these young players need time to get into a new club, surroundings, feel comfortable and finally have enough experience to become successful. Often one season is not enough for that.

Im sure they had a reason why they introduced this. Whatever reason it is. And the fact that we still include buy-out closes to the contracts of our youngsters and that we still use this buy-out clause to get them back seems to me to be not that wrong.
 
Image

according to Marca, the club will call his agent today and will bring him back from Getafe using the buy-back option for 4M €.

2 weeks ago Pardeza said he's not coming back, so sure some plans have changed.

Excellent.

Spanish, canterano, young, very talented, cheap and a very good option as a wide man midfielder (interior or volante) in a 4-4-2 (ala Pelegrini), 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1.

Excellent, excellent news.
 
He would be the perfect sub for Kaka or we can even play like this:

Casillas
S.Ramos Pepe Albiol Marcelo
Lass Xabi
C.Ronaldo Kaka Granero
Benzema

Maybe that's what Pellegrini has in mind?
 
I don't want Higuain to be benched either but I am just trying to think what Pellegrini wants. He wants a Left or Right Sided mid. He apparently wants Kaka to play through the middle so that leaves us with 1 spot for Benz/Pipita/Raul/Ruud and Benz will get the start. Pipita can play as a RM but I prefer to see him in a 442 as the Support Striker.
 
Image


gotta love Granero for doing that

truly Madridsta
 
21 - 40 of 251 Posts