OK It´s maybe a stupid thread cause I don´t like either this kind of comparations, but what I want to say is that we are always seeing how Ronaldo is called "the best striker in the world" and others are forgotten. Others like this Adriano.
When Ronaldo played in FC Barcelona, he was incredible. He was unstoppable. He took the ball, and he was able to dribble the opponents from midfield to the goal. Now, Ronaldo is an opportunist player. His goals are (90%) pushing the ball to the net from 5-10 metres. Adriano is much more complete. He´s dangerous from far distance, he plays for the others as well, and he scores a lot of goals.
So we should to start to diferenciate among the opportunist strikers (some of them terribly goods, like Ronaldo) and the complete strikers (like Adriano).
When Ronaldo played in FC Barcelona, he was incredible. He was unstoppable. He took the ball, and he was able to dribble the opponents from midfield to the goal. Now, Ronaldo is an opportunist player. His goals are (90%) pushing the ball to the net from 5-10 metres. Adriano is much more complete. He´s dangerous from far distance, he plays for the others as well, and he scores a lot of goals.
So we should to start to diferenciate among the opportunist strikers (some of them terribly goods, like Ronaldo) and the complete strikers (like Adriano).