The guy is a thug. He took the ball yesterday but still managed to injure Digard. He's also done the same to other players in matches. He is worse than Barton for his disregard for other players' health.
I just can't believe nobody in the media has really made anything of it. Barton used to get criticised whenever he made a challenge, and he's never really made rash challenges, just beat-up team-mates off the pitch.
Cattermole is a quite thug. He does it and then walks away as if what he did wasnt wrong, but doesnt get into a straight up fist fight with anyone (like Keane, Barton) in other words he is a wimp, but a dirty prick on the football pitch.
I despise this guy and it will only be a matter of time until he does something really bad to someone. There are reckless tacklers and then just pure spiteful tacklers with total intent on injury. I mean he plays next to Michael Brown of all people and even makes him look clean. Yesterdays tackle was horrendous, the commentator on BBC called it but BBC brushed it off.
Easily the most dangerous player in the EPL at the moment. I cringe every single time I see a 50-50 tackle with him involved. I actually don't think he's a good tackler either, he simply goes in as hard as he can.
He will seriously injure quite a few players before his career is through.
Bullshit. Neill is no angel but he's nowhere near as dangerous as Cattermole is. That's the issue here. You don't see Neill flying into challenges with his feet way of the ground like Cattermole. No. Neil is definitely not on his level.
He'll probably seriously injure himself at some point.
^ correct. There is a difference between being a thug/**** who hits and kicks people. That is malicious, but not dangerous like Cattermole is. Cattermole doesn't seem to care if he injures a player, and I've yet to see him even apologise for a tackle or show any remorse.
The worst thing is seeing Bruce consistently defend him.