[Osman]

You are dictating what we should expect or be happy about with our club and coach, and blankly say you DONT WATCH OUR GAMES. So frankly, you saying we should be happy with beyond horrible football by a beyond terrible coach, is to say the least, outragelously bizzare.

Not to mention the patronizing and righteously high minded way you are flaunting your extreme ignorance of the sitaution with our team and how they play (you dont see the games AT ALL, just repeating for effect so it can really frigging get through to you), is to put it mildly, quite insulting.

But OFCOURSE, saying there is not anything more to say to you who takes a stance on something you dont know anything about (read: you are IGNORANT), is the unfortunate part of this all. So sorry it bothers you so that no one would communicate with you. But you happen to be probably the only mofo in the world to have said this: And I say yes, as Raqnieri has the experience and skills to make you a very good team again.

While admitting you dont watch his absolutely pathetic and retarded coaching. So ****ing hilarious if it wasnt so bizzare.


P.S Even if you base it on last season, but still think Ranieri is the right coach to take us ahead, then you way worse then ignorant, but you actually saw it with your own eyes, but is actually ****ing clueless to judge things for what they are.

 

[Osman]

You deserve to be more then lynched for saying this:

And I say yes, as Raqnieri has the experience and skills to make you a very good team.


There has been enough horrid Empoli and Samp 0-0s bottom of the pile awful games in his helm, that I am absolutely astounded you just said that.

 

[Osman]

Nobody is asking you to drop in again and again to reiterate that never mind the quality of the football, we are such an inferior side at present that Ranieri is all we should hope for, because we deserve nothing better.

Couldnt have put it any better or described his bullshit more clear.

Weirdest part of all is it that at the end, he is the one to keep saying how offended he is to not have his opinions appriciated.

 

[Osman]

I dont like Spalletti in overall competence because he is a one trick pony tactically, but would take him still because he atleast HAVE a tactic.

 

[Osman]

I said I dont like Spalletti already (extreme one trick pony). But if there is little other choice, I rather lose in style, while actually being able to pass around and playing attractively even if you are doing **** all, then this shambolic excuse of football coaching that we endure under Ranieri.

He is way better then Ranieri, even if the improvement he would bring might not be enough.

 

[Osman]

Hehehe

 

[Osman]

So the difference will be benching Il Capitano, our most consistent game winner, for an insanely useless Pavel? (his formation doesnt really work without a regista).

Hehe, that wouldnt be a good start for Spalletti, the only worse start then that, is if he god forbid, took Perrotta with him.

 

[Osman]

Nothing more exciting then Del Piero doing the tango with ze ball roud: I dont have the luxury to be demanding excitement right now, I settle with winning frigging games p Its too much to expect for Ranieri to shape up and manage to make us play decently ala Spalletti.

He was spoiled by players like Del Piero saving his ass with consistent game winners, like the one in the second Roma game. Who needs a gameplan when you rely heavily few quality players scoring in the 1-2 chances we mustered up? p The difference this season is...man has made us even worse.

 

[Osman]

He's too good for Juve.

Hardly, he is a charming coach, but he is anything but that. He is not even too good for Roma, despite his attractive football. I know you are making a bitter sentimental point based on rivalry dislike, but just making the point either way. Dont think he is even too good for Udinese.

 

[Osman]

Very well said Mo.


Hassan, I actually like Spalletti, I watched Roma for years because of his charming football. In no way am I comparing him to Ranieri, or saying he is anywhere bad. But specifically him, just pointing out his flaws.

Watching alot of Roma makes it painstackingly clear that not only is he bad at the mental parts of coaching (cant seem to be inspiring them much in training when he looks like he is about to shit himself on the bench, seems like a total emo with how depressed and lost he looks on the bench), but mainly how incredibly naive and simple his football is, despite being so attractive. Tactically, he is one track mind, no gear 2-3 or such, but just play in one way and damn it if he ever adapts to the conditions of the specific match or the teams current roster, seen him crash into the walls so to speak in many games, without even noticing it from the bench, let alone do anything about it. There are enough flaws in his coaching, despite how deceivingly appealing it is at first glance, for me to be quite sure that even if he may get close to it, I dont see him winning much of anything any time soon. Yes he is better then Ranieri, and for sure more appealing football, and that itself is worth gold at the moment in a way, but in the long run, we need a winner, thats why we dont like Ranieri, disposed of Ancelotti etc. IMO Spalletti wont make us win, would probably get closer to it then Ranieri, but thats not much of endorsement is it?

 

[Osman]

Glen, FYI, we didnt play well against Zenit at all (except being steady in defense), we created **** all, all game long.

 

[Osman]

Thats true really, we are way more demanding then Arsenal fans and Arsenal board, so it wouldnt fly too well. But since my dream coach is Wenger, there isnt anything more I would want then have him in Juve, despite the flaws that is visible in his footballing project.

 

[Osman]

Its a hang up of his to develop them all from scratch in the last couple of years, before that, he blended great players NOW he discovered with future great youngsters etc.

 

[Osman]

Are you saying Arsenal have way bigger wage budget then Milan and Inter?

Because I not too long ago the myth that is your Arsenal players earning too little was busted by the fact that it was shown that Arsenals wage budget is like 2-3m less then man U's. Which is basically the same (hence your players dont earn a pittance as its too often said). Dont think Milan and Inter have less then both of you, prolly more or less the same or close. While granted, Chelsea are in their own league.


And I oughta think its been well established in this summer that Wenger not spending is his own preference.

 

[Osman]

Ranieri's contract will end in the summer. The worst thing they can ever do is renew it, but they wont prolly, I hope to God they wont. They wont fire him, they will just wait til the contract ends.

 

[Osman]

Damn, I heard it was up until this coming summer :frustrat: I slept better because I was thinking that :groan:

 

[Osman]

Their players wanted to leave, and some prolly do, because they havent been winning enough. And Wenger having alot of kids is not related to salaries, Arsenals salary budget is like 2-3m less then Man U's, basically the same.

 

[Osman]

How do you know that he is pleased with Molinaro? I'm sure if he could have Evra he would take him, but we don't have anyone else than Molinaro. So he has to play him.

Ummm, 2nd season in a row we have Molinaro, the "we are stuck with him" angle has LONG since become mute. Ranieri chooses to start him, finding better fullback then Molinaro is NOT hard (Molinaro is NOT good, improving on him doesnt only mean worlds finest in Evra, our very own Criscito who even plays LB only this season, is better then him), no one forces Ranieri to play him, no one says he cant sign someone else.

He dumped Boumsong immediately and decided he didnt like him, if you say he is stuck with players, see that as example. No such thing with Molinaro, him starting him all the time for the 2nd season in a row, does NOT mean Molinaro is forced upon him, on the contrary. Wake up and smell the roses.

 

[Osman]

I dont disagree with that, thats the basic reality, but the bottomlime is Ranieri still starts Molinaro and sees him as a good enough option. NO ONE forces him to play him.

 

[Osman]

Yet you failed to name someone since Criscito has only played LB regularlythis season and has yet to prove he is better than Molinaro.

Are you fvcking kidding me?????