Hagi, Dragomir, Nedelcu, Mitrita, Bancu all promising and Marin is CONFIRMED. The rest, meh. Baluta Confirmed IMO.Benzar (23) -- CONFIRMED, best RB we have, hopefully OK after injury
Balasa (19) -- also CONFIRMED IMO; we used Grigore for a long time, Balasa now needs a chance; another injury
Hodorogea (21) -- meh
Vatajelu (22) -- could be used, did pretty well
Filip (21) -- LOL
Bumba (21) -- mostly disappeared
Tanase (21) -- does OK
Rotariu (20) -- mostly disappeared after going abroad
Ivan (19) -- overrated (sorry Pele) and injured?
Matei (22) -- didn't succeed abroad, maybe Astra can save him
Stanciu (22) -- CONFIRMED for us, but no success abroad (yet), high pressure
Andone (22) -- CONFIRMED for his club; our style doesn't suit him
Puscas (19) -- confirmed, but at U21 level
I´m talking about players that i think have shown enough, not the ones that are juniors (Hagi or Dragomir), are very raw (Nedelcu or Marin) or already showed signs that they may dissapoint (Mitrita, Bus, Nica or M. Roman for example)
Maybe with the others but I disagree about Dragomir. Even if he doesn't play for Arsenal's first team, it's a decent level of football and he shows enough with our youth teams. He is also serious and should clearly rise in the next years with some loan time. Playing so well for U23s in Premier League 2 at 18 isn't bad, whereas Puscas struggled even in Serie B until the end of the season where he exploded. Now he is in a horrible situation besides his one goal for Benevento (they are a horrible team to be fair, but he should be playing more then). I guess I could have ranked better purely in potential, though.I wouldn't include players without minutes yet in professional football (Dragomir, Micovschi and even Pascanu excluded). And U21 is the limit, older than that won't be included.
Considering that, and judging essentially the potential and not so much their current form, my list:
I considered Matan, Costache and Screciu too, but they need more time.