Xtratime Community banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,713 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
from www.worldcuparchives.com


By Matthew Monk

The Boys from Brazil



Ask yourself a question: when do you think the World Cup starts for real? The opening game? The start of the knock out phase? The final itself? Or when Brazil play their first match?

For many people, the World Cup does not truly begin until that team in gold and green make their debut, and regardless of what or who has gone before them, the expectation and hype surrounding Brazil overshadows everything. Today was no different. And if you agree with this answer, then read no further - you are not likely to like what you see.

This is not an outstanding, unbeatable Brazilian team - far from it, the stumbling path they picked through the South American qualifiers gave hope to many potential opponents this summer. And after watching Brazil struggle to defeat Turkey today, the coaches of France, Argentina, Italy, Portugal and Spain will be rubbing their hands with glee.

Brazil have played worse at the World Cup than they did today - Claudio Coutinho's 1978 version barely survived against Spain and Austria - but rarely has a Brazil team looked less likely to do well at the tournament progressed.

Brazil never managed to dominate the game, as they would have done so many times in the past. Turkey are a good, tough side, and were deserved quarter finalists in the last European Championship, but they are hardly earth-shattering opposition. Yet they easily matched Brazil for long periods, and belittled the odds makers who were offering 6 to 1 for them to win. What we were seeing again was the media's love affair with anything dressed in gold and green, a love affair that ignores hard fact and glorifies the current team based on what last happened sixteen years ago.

1986 was when a truly outstanding Brazilian team last played a game in the World Cup, and though good form was shown in 1990, 1994 and 1998 the form of Socrates, Careca and Josimar has not been reproduced for a long time.

Now before I get rambling emails from disgruntled Brazilian fans, I do not hate Brazil, nor do I believe that Bebeto, Romario, Ronaldo, Rivaldo and Roberto Carlos are poor players. Far from it, they are some of the most gifted footballers the world has seen in the last 10 years. Similarly the heights reached by Pelé's 1970 or Socrates' 1982 team have rarely been equalled, never mind surpassed. But that cannot mean that this current squad is beyond criticism.

But when I set out to write this column I simply meant to focus on what I perceived to be the deficiencies of the squad; I was annoyed by the usual obsession with Brazil ignoring all other teams, but so what, that was hardly unusual was it?

But while I watching the game today - and when I visited the official FIFA website after the game - I became exasperated by the totally predisposed coverage, in particular the way Rivaldo's shameful playacting has been ignored. FIFA named him Man of the Match - seemingly for scoring a penalty - and did not even mention his insidious actions.

Before the tournament began FIFA made a big play of cracking down on cheating, highlighting a directive for referees to give yellow cards for shirt pulling, diving, playacting and ungentlemanly conduct. Rivaldo managed to both dive and playact when Hakan Unsal kicked the ball at him right at the end of the game. Watch the incident for yourself. The ball clearly strikes Rivaldo: squarely on the knee. He goes down in agony, clutching his face and head, as if he had been struck by something thrown from the crowd. The referee - the utterly inept Kim Young Joo of Korea - was unsighted, he had to have been, for why else would he have let Rivaldo get away with this cheating?

Hakan Unsal is stupid for doing such a daft thing, for letting his temper take control of him, but what he did warranted a yellow card at most. Now this would have still meant his expulsion - he had been cautioned midway through the first half - but a good referee would have taken that into consideration before he acted. Mr Kim did no such thing. He marched up to Unsal and sent him off. He did not show him a second yellow card, although the official FIFA match report says this is the reason he was sent from the field. That in itself shows ineptitude, but when you add it to Kim's failure to take action against Rivaldo, and his prior failures you get a very sorry picture.

And why did Unsal do such a heinous thing in the first place? He was angry, he was livid, irate. Why? Because Brazil had just been awarded a penalty for an incident that clearly took place outside the box. There was no need for controversy here. Luizao was fouled crudely by Alpay, and as he was arguably the last man a sending off was justified. But it was no penalty. Unless you were Mr Kim. The free kick should have been taken from two or three metres outside the box, and who knows what would have happened? Given the awful free kicks from Roberto Carlos and Ronaldinho Gaucho earlier in the game, and the excellent form of Rustu in the Turkish goal, it is conceivable that Turkey would have one point right know, as would Brazil. Instead Rivaldo scored the penalty - just - that won them the game.

Perhaps on the overall 90 minutes Brazil had been slightly better, and had Alpay not brought down Luizao, and a goal been scored, few people would have complained. I certainly would not have. But after such unfairness I find it impossible to do anything but concur with Senol Gunes, who said "We wanted three points, but couldn't get them for reasons I won't mention. We came here with great pride and we leave with great pride… We produced a great effort but we couldn't get the result we deserved. There is an injustice about the result. I have to say that, an injustice."

Strong words, but honest words as well. This was an injustice, perpetrated by Kim Young Joo, and then compounded by the insidious actions of Rivaldo, and the complicity of Kim.

Two things stick in my mind here. First, Rivaldo is a cheat. He agrees. This is what he said after the game, reported by the BBC for all to see: "Obviously I exaggerated the incident for the guy to be sent off. The ball hit my hand and my leg. It didn't hit me in the face but that kind of attitude must not be allowed on the pitch. He deserved a red card."

You can make up your own mind about his very questionable morals, but that kind of attitude needs to driven out of football. Rivaldo has openly admitted to taking a dive, to cheating. He is guilty of that and of ungentlemanly conduct. If anyone deserved a red card it was him. Rivaldo is a lucky man. Alpay was incensed and went to 'talk' to Rivaldo. Roque Junior put his huge frame in front of the Turk, and Alpay sized up the situation and turned away. But he should not be so lucky after the disciplinary committee have finished with him. Rivaldo should be suspended for his cheating, not just fined. But neither of these will happen.

I said two things stuck in my mind. The second was the start of the game. The two teams are presented to Sepp Blatter. Nothing unusual in that you say? Well France and Senegal were not presented to a single dignitary before the opening match, and I cannot remember Sepp going down to meet and greet a single player before any game so far, nor before the last World Cup final. But it is not this that is strange. What is bothering me is the way he embraced Ronaldo, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho Gaucho, Roberto Carlos and the others so warmly. He kissed several of them on their cheeks, and laughed and joked with the others like a long lost uncle at a meaningless friendly. This was a competitive World Cup match, which was more than likely to decide which team won Group C. Blatter made no secret of who he - the supposedly impartial FIFA President - was supporting. Now here is the bit that proves I am paranoid.

Mr Kim is not exactly the perfect choice for such a high profile World Cup match. He has been refereeing international matches since 1994, but this is his first World Cup finals game. Before this, the biggest game he has ever been in charge of was the massive Confederations Cup clash between the superpowers of the USA and Mexico. Impressive CV eh? That is supposed to be ironic, by the way.

And this was the 'experienced' whistle blower put in charge of a vital, decisive finals match. Who is in charge of selecting which referee takes charge of which game? The referees committee of FIFA. Who is in charge of that? Who else but the man in charge of FIFA, and the man who hugged and embraced Ronaldo and his friends before the game: Sepp.

Lets not start any conspiracy theories here. I am not suggesting for a minute that Sepp instructed the hapless Mr Kim to give a non-existent penalty, send off Alpay and ignore Rivaldo's cheating. I will leave that to all the crazies on the forums. No, what I am suggesting is that Sepp and his cronies gave control of this vital match to Kim because he is from Korea. And as Brazil always garner huge TV audiences that would give additional exposure to the Korean FA (co-hosts of the tournament) and show off how 'good' they are, through their representative. Ignore the fact that Kim has never refereed a big match before, or that he was not a good official - Korea need to be represented and looked after. Expect Japan to get similar treatment soon. But just hope their referee is better that Mr Kim.

Still, while I have your attention, we may as well face a few facts. It would not be beyond FIFA to make qualification as easy for Brazil as they can. Brazil makes a lot of money for FIFA and they supply TV audiences that no other nation - not even France or England - can bring in for non-knock out games. This brings in even more money, more advertising revenue, sells a few hundred thousand more bottles of Coca-Cola and makes Sepp very happy. It is in FIFA's interest to see Brazil do well. Why else do they get the easy groups? Why else was Ronaldo allowed to play in the 1998 final after his name was left off the official team list handed in to the referee? And why else will the con artist, the swindler Rivaldo, get away with his cheating? Because Brazil is more important than Turkey, and they get special treatment from FIFA.

Just imagine for a second that Maradona or Zidane had come out after a game and said that he had blatantly cheated. He would have been suspended faster than Big Joâo could fix an election. There is one rule for Brazil and separate rules for everyone else.

It is not fair. It is an injustice. Turkey were robbed. We were robbed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
102 Posts
Turks are cry a babies. You lost waq quit crying. You lost fair and square. You had one chance and you scored. Brazil dominated the game and Turkey could never in a million years beat Brazil.

If that animal at the end of the game was civilized he wouldnt shoot a ball at a player and none of this would have happened. If the defenders werent so lazy he wouldnt tug a jersey and get gladly sent off.

Plus when ronaldo was tripped another player should have been sent off.
 

·
Cachorro
Joined
·
18,741 Posts
Yes, it was a very well-written article, although clearly partial. hey, we're all partial when it comes to a World Cup, I suppose, so it's understandable. But I have to disagree strongly at least with one thing.

waq said:
Two things stick in my mind here. First, Rivaldo is a cheat. He agrees. This is what he said after the game, reported by the BBC for all to see: "Obviously I exaggerated the incident for the guy to be sent off. The ball hit my hand and my leg. It didn't hit me in the face but that kind of attitude must not be allowed on the pitch. He deserved a red card."

You can make up your own mind about his very questionable morals, but that kind of attitude needs to driven out of football. Rivaldo has openly admitted to taking a dive, to cheating. He is guilty of that and of ungentlemanly conduct. If anyone deserved a red card it was him.
Let me get this straight - Rivaldo deserved a red card?!? For diving?? Hey, if we're gonna start handing out red cards to players who fake things on the pitch, Argentina will NEVER finish a game with 11 players agains. Which would be, of course, somewhat enjoyable, but that's not my point.

My point is: I agree that diving and faking injuries is a bad thing, and that it should be banned. But when we see defensive midfielders hacking down opponents with slide tackles, elbows being swung around on corner kicks, forwards being viciously tackled fom behind by slow defenders... shouldn't we focus on the real problems in today's soccer? A player shoots a ball at an opposing player on purpose, and everyone is outraged at the player who got hit?!? Hello? Which is worse, the aggression or the playacting?

This is even more aggravating when I remember the protests when Chilavert was banned for several international matches for spitting on Roberto Carlos. Chilavert, as we all know, is a lowlife scumbag - I mean, everyone in the whole wide world knows that. Spitting on an opponent's face because you've lost a match to him is just about the ugliest act any sportsman can do, it's revolting. But there were all these guys saying that "Brazil is treated better than the others" and such baloney. Now there are people who were outraged by Chilavert's ban who think Rivaldo should be banned for playacting!! Is this amazing or what?

Look, the ref in the Turkey vs, Brazil match was LOUSY. He svcked HARD all through the match. He made mistake for both sides. There was a penalty for Brazil that he didn't see, and instead called a corner on it - Turkey's excellent goalie was holding Rivaldo's shirt inside the area. Now, that's a penalty, right? But the legion of Brazil-bashers are only too happy to pretend THAT didn't happen. They saw half a dozen penalties for Turkey that the 'evil' referee didn't give, and they cry about how ruthless and violent Brazil was. Do any of them know that Brazil was the team that suffered more fouls on the first round, with 22 fouls committed by Turkey?

That's right, Turkey was the most violent team in the entire first round. Turkey stayed in their defense 85% of the game. Turkey never, ever deserved to win that match. But in the last minute, the incompetent referee, after making mistakes during the entire match, called a penalty that wasn't a penalty. Was that the biggest mistake of them all? Duh, yes! Was it cunningly planned to benefit Brazil? That's entirely up to your imaginations. And as we all know, losers have a lot of time to imagine excuses, as they're never celebrating. ;) The Turkey players deserved to be sent off due to their violent behavior, and Turkey deserved to lose because Brazil was better. But the referee's huge mistake is JUST the excuse they wanted: it gives them something to cling to, something they can point at when they're making up their little conspiracy theories. That's right, boys, Turkey lost because of the huge international FIFA conspiracy to help Brazil! That MUST be it - how else would Brazil beat Turkey? :howler:

I'm just glad that the penalty wasn't against us, as the numbskull ref could have [email protected] in either direction.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
33,807 Posts
Let's not forget: all the things for which Brasil was criticised, including Rivaldo's play-acting, occur in almost every football match.

Also let's not forget that Turkey played very roughly and got away with many fouls the referee never called.

It seems very important, however, especially for the media, to characterize this match as a case of innocent and saintly Turkey being cheated out of a deserved win by the horrible bully, Brasil, and a conspiring referee.

What happened is not completely unusual, and there is blame to go around, so there is no need to single out one player or one team and there is no need to make such a big deal out of the events.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,197 Posts
Let them speak like that; I read an Argentina fan talk about how ashamed we should feel and how we are cheaters. I mean how come everyone likes to bash Rivaldo when a guy like Maradruga, I mean Maradona uses his hand to win the World Cup? :rolleyes:

Rivaldo's diving did no harm to the game at all, many players dive and they get caught and all they get is sometimes just a warning. Rivaldo got kicked no matter what and he's being punished more then the Turkish players. Sad, but true!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
33,807 Posts
Beta took a dive in the match against the United States. The only consequence was a yellow card. I am still waiting for the outrage, fines, and press conferences.
 

·
Canonized
Joined
·
37,734 Posts
ABout the wrong penalty.

People feel sorry for Turkey because of what?? If the guy had not flouled Luizao he would have SCORED.......... the last time i sw Luizaom iss a goal like that was when he played for Palmeiras in 96...since then he learned how to score goals! They would have lost anyway if TURKEY HAD NOT APPEALED TO ANTI FOOTBALL TACTICS!!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,614 Posts
Brazil won the match fair and square! And don't dare say brasil was just a little bit better than turkey. on that day, brazil looked EASILY like the most exciting team in the world cup.

brazil dominated the first half. hell, they played 40 minutes inside the turkey half of the field. the only reason brazil wasn't winning 3x1 at halftime is that rivaldo and ronaldinho were greedy and didn't pass the ball to ronaldo when he was wide open. turkey created one good chance and scored. but after that, it was all brazil again.

the cream rises to the top. and if you play long enough, eventually the better team will come out on top. it's a law of nature: eventually the better team will win. and that's what happened.

as ze da fiel said, if the turk didn't pull down luizao in the penalty area, he would have put the ball in the back of the net and won the game anyway.

turkey fans should stop complaining. they weren't robbed. they played a great game, yes. but they got what they earned: zero points from brazil. you can't play 90 minutes against brasil and take 3 shots and expect to get a point.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top