Hala Madrid said:
Koeman, what has Mista ever done to merit a starting spot in la seleccion? ok he was good last season but come on hes not even playing regularly in Valencia and he would NEVER work as a lone striker unless you have a 10 like Aimar or Valeron behind him. Baraja is a constant faliure with the NT and has been awful the last couple of seasons, he never really recaptured that sensational form of his in Valencia's campaign 3 years ago.
Iraola over Salgado? Michel has been in great form this season and has been one of Madrid's best players all along, and he plays really well with La Seleccion too. Also, Raul is not driving us to the failure, we are already failures. No matter who plays.
Mista is scoring goals with Valencia, since he's playing (he was out because the team didn't want to renew him) and, as far as I know, he's doing it regularly in the last 2 or 3 months. In any case, why don't you apply the same argument to Morientes? Morientes has played less than Mista for sure. IMO, Mista is the the Spanish striker in the best form... you wanted a "10", well, he would not have a 10 in the system that I've posted, but he would have De la Peña and Xavi behind him plus Luque and Joaquín in the wings.
Baraja is the best player of Valencia this season, better than Albelda, IMO. I wonder who else could be a decent DM, maybe Gurpegi, but he won't have a chance until the doping issue is finished. I don't like Helguera in that position, so Baraja seems the best choice to me, although I'm not a big fan of him.
Iraola over Salgado, for sure. Iraola is a good defender, with a great projection in attack. His crosses are 100 times better than Salgado's ones and I don't think that Salgado is doing that well. Actually, I think that his form is poor, although I know about his match yesterday night.
Finally, Raul must be out. He can't play just for his name and he's doing that in Madrid. If Madrid thinks that they have to make him play, it's okay for me, but not in the NT when several players are doing much more better than him. He had his time and it's over... I don't know if he will show up his best form one day, for now, he's pathetic. It sounds bad, but it's the truth. Raul's form is awful, he creeps on the pitch.
I've defended Raul for 2 years, because during this time I thought that he just had a bad moment. The truth is that 2 years is enough and he can't live from the past. I don't care if he's the captain or the best player since Suarez, if he's a problem for the team, he must be out.
15 years ago, Clemente left "La Quinta del Buitre" out of the NT because that spine was unable to reach the final phase of the Euro 1992. There were several players who had been living of their names (Butragueño, Michel, Sanchis and some others who did great during the 5 consecutive leagues of Madrid), but already in 1990, there was a new generation of players that was doing great and they showed it in the Olympic Games: Guardiola, Ferrer, Luis Enrique, Cañizares, Kiko, etc.
Personally, I don't want to be out of the WC and this posibility is very serious. Do we have to wait until we're totally out of the WC to take Raul off? Butragueño had his time and Raul has it too. If Yeste, De la Peña, Torres or any other who is playmaker or second striker is doing better, then he should have play. Raul is a problem for the NT, not a solution.
And we won't have a problem of leadership in the team, since people like Puyol or Casillas have personality and experience enough to carry the team.
If Luxemburgo were fair, Owen had played since the first day and Raul would be benched. Still Raul gets the favouritism of the fans. I understand that the madridistas love him, but the Spanish NT is the team of everyone and Raul doesn't mean anything to me. I know that Raul has done great for the NT in the past, but also Butragueño, Hierro and Luis Enrique. As I've said, I've defended Raul because I know that he's a good player, one of the best of our history... but after 2 years, someone must say enough. This guy is not playing anything. He must be out.
Maybe Raul is not the cause of the failure, but he's not the solution for it.