Xtratime Community banner

1 - 20 of 35 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
269 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Would someone who saw this match please post a brief report for those of us who unfortunately weren't able to watch it.

Tusen takk!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,928 Posts
I especially liked that "defensive forward" Braaten...wtf was all the hype about this guy... he gave away sth like 7 fouls(3 of them were yellow-card-material and one should be a red - although he only got 1 yellow)... "defensive forward" indeed :wallbang:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,706 Posts
Braaten's really out of form atm, noone understand why he's at the NT. Got maybe the greatest potensial of any Norwegian player, but he's silly lazy. Rarely makes any effort and really slows down the game. He's got some amazing games, but needs to get his act together if he wants to make it big.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,959 Posts
Forgot to congratulate you guys on the 3 points. The match was lousy, but you were fortunate enough to convert your chances into goals. ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,928 Posts
You are efficient, I will give you that... and would also make a brilliant rugby team... but, you won, so I will be quiet... as long as I don't hear you say that you were the better side or that you outplayed us.. that is just wrong ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,402 Posts
Jinxter said:
Braaten's really out of form atm, noone understand why he's at the NT. Got maybe the greatest potensial of any Norwegian player, but he's silly lazy. Rarely makes any effort and really slows down the game. He's got some amazing games, but needs to get his act together if he wants to make it big.
I understand very well why he's at our NT. Last night was fantastic in terms of defensive contributions and this comes from someone who doesn't even like the guy.

Heia Norge gutter, dette skal vi klare :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,706 Posts
He did run a lot this game, but that almost never happens. In retrospect, it was a good choice to bring him along, but I'd never have said so beforehand. And he didn't contribute much in the second half, but he did run a lot.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,633 Posts
lili said:
Forgot to congratulate you guys on the 3 points. The match was lousy...
I don't agree, I think the match was very good, just the wrong side won. ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,633 Posts
And your point is? :rollani:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
215 Posts
That you're not able to see that the better side won because of your biast oppinion.

You had the possession, but we were better infront of both goals, and in the end that's all that counts. Besides, when a team leads the game three times and is in the lead for almost the entire game, it is hardly undeserved.

We played like crap but still won. What does that say about Slovenia?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,633 Posts
Bruiser said:
That you're not able to see that the better side won because of your biast oppinion.
And your opinion is unbiased, right? I thought so. I said nothing against the game in Oslo as there you were clearly better side and won with merit, no question about that.


You had the possession, but we were better infront of both goals, and in the end that's all that counts.
We created much more chances than you even though you played a cattenaccio for the whole 2nd half and we were denied of 2 clear penalties.


Besides, when a team leads the game three times and is in the lead for almost the entire game, it is hardly undeserved.
That is your definition. Following it, the team that scores a goal in 10th minute in a 1:0 win deserves the win more that the team that scores in 80th minute, right?


We played like crap but still won.
Exactly.


What does that say about Slovenia?
That we were just unlucky not to win the game.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,959 Posts
OAnimal said:
I don't agree, I think the match was very good, just the wrong side won. ;)
I meant lousy played from the norwegian team. :D Did they shot direction goal 5 times? :pp
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,959 Posts
Thotobald said:
Norway deserved to win. Our players fought with their hearts, while yours didn't fight that much.

Good luck tomorrow.
They were more than less defending for the whole match and scored 3 goals in counter attacks, had the referee on their side and also luck. It was enough to win and like i said, congratulations. Just don't start selling what a great football they played, cause even Ray Charles wouldn't have said that. ;)
Good luck to you as well tomorrow. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
215 Posts
OAnimal said:
That is your definition. Following it, the team that scores a goal in 10th minute in a 1:0 win deserves the win more that the team that scores in 80th minute, right?
Wrong. By my definition it means that a team that takes the lead three times and finally wins is not the wrong team to win the match.

OAnimal said:
That we were just unlucky not to win the game.
When you let in three goals at home and you were in addition lucky to score the two you got, you were not unlucky to lose, nor were we lucky to win.

OAnimal said:
We created much more chances than you even though you played a cattenaccio for the whole 2nd half and we were denied of 2 clear penalties.
Now its TWO clear penalties? Seems like you're adding a penalty for each time you try to put forth an argument. The supposed hand-ball situation didn't look close to a penalty.

Let me put it like this; Wich team deserves to win; The team scoring the goals or the one wasting its chances? You don't win matches by wasting chances you know.
 
1 - 20 of 35 Posts
Top