Xtratime Community banner

Is it worth losing Pele to secure Quaresma?

Pele for Quaresma? Is it Worth it?

2373 Views 76 Replies 28 Participants Last post by  las7
Simple, is it worth losing Pele to secure Quaresma?

Poll please, curious to see what everyone thinks.


I'm personally sick of this whole Quaresma fiasco and as much I wanted Quaresma to join, I'm not very keen on losing Pele.

Pele is going to be world class, I'm sure of it.

Rarely have a seen such composure from a central midfielder of Pele's age. He integrated into the top club in Serie A seamlessly and never looked out of place. Young super-talented center/defensive mid's with the composure of Pele are a lot tougher to find then talented attacking players such as Quaresma.

Sure, Quaresma is also special, however there are many other attacking players out there Inter could have signed while keeping Pele as well. I would have rather bought Menez for 12-14m like Roma did or broken the bank for Arshivan, Diego etc then lose Pele for Quaresma.

This going to come back to haunt Inter. It's going to be another Pirlo, Seedorf, Bergkamp, Roberto Carlos type transfer and all of us going to be sick to our stomach when PdC sells Pele for 20m+ in few years time.

For once, Inter's scouts find a young talented player at an obscure club, buy him for peanuts, he turns out good and what to we do......SELL HIM!?!

Have we become a club that needs to sell their top young talents in order to raise transfer funds?

Not worth it IMO
61 - 77 of 77 Posts
now, back to this topic...i was the one who did not object this move..but certainly, this transfer did not turn out to be as good as we expected...i guess pele wouldn't have been a downgrade compared to muntari...

i think we are suffering from the loss of pele (not really a big loss but muntari isn't better than him)...plus, Q...sigh...really disappointed...


You were not the only one that wanted RQ, many of the hardcore fans here, wanted him.

Actually many of the hardcore fans on here wanted JM also.

Every time you make a transfer, and spend big money, it is expected that it quickly produce dividends. However we've learned from our history, and the history of other clubs, that that isn't always the case.

The best way is too seek out young talent or scout leagues where you can find gems before they become expensive, like Maicon or Cesar or even the young crybaby we have up front.

However for anyone on here to think that Inter should buy this player or that, he'll help us or he'll produce is somewhat foolish.

Transfers are hit and miss. Sometimes you spend big, and get a Zlatan.

Sometimes you spend big, and get a dud like RQ.

Sometime you spend little and get a Wome....but then you could get a Maicon...in other words it all evens out in the end.

The mistake wasn't the player, but the position the player plays. Having said this, JM wanted to try a different formation. I give him the benefit of the doubt until the end of the season.

BTW, its not unheard of player changing it around. Don't give up hope yet.


Just to add, this is why I'm a huge advocate of looking in your league first, before looking abroad. Yes its cheaper to do so, but players will know the league and the lifestyle.
See less See more
yes...that's true...but i think no one including mourinho himself expected quaresma would be that bad...there were players we have spent big bucks but didn't turn out to be successful... like farinos...

also, according to history, i don't think mourinho hasn't been that good in signing new players...he has made some good signings like drogba and essien...but also has made some bad decisions to sign some players...
yes...that's true...but i think no one including mourinho himself expected quaresma would be that bad...there were players we have spent big bucks but didn't turn out to be successful... like farinos...

also, according to history, i don't think mourinho hasn't been that good in signing new players...he has made some good signings like drogba and essien...but also has made some bad decisions to sign some players...
Only a select few have been able to make brilliant move after brilliant move.

You bring up Drogba, wasn't Drogba crap in his first year? Refresh my memory, I don't follow the English league.
Drogba was good but didn't score as much in his first season.
Only a select few have been able to make brilliant move after brilliant move.

You bring up Drogba, wasn't Drogba crap in his first year? Refresh my memory, I don't follow the English league.
maybe that's the question for those who follow EPL regularly...i didn't watch chelsea as much...had very limited knowledge about them...but i didn't think drogba was as bad as quaresma...

anyway, all 3 purchases (quaresma, mancini and muntari) are not having good year...2 of them are bench warmers and muntari makes u wonder does the guy have a brain...lot of stupid actions...
Transfers are hit and miss.
Sure, but the disappointing one has only "missed" so far.

60m€ budget out the window.

Thats some accomplishment tbh, not many coaches lack that much feeling about which players will fit a team and which wont.

Im sure you could make a list of players and point 3 players out randomly and do a better job regarding transfer than Mourinho has done this season.
It isn't like Pele has lit the world on fire either....

That said, we should have held onto Pele...he has much less of a cost than Quaresma
I'm not so worried about the trade for Pele. I'm worried about not having beefed up the midfield enough. Dacourt is effectively out, Vieira with constant injury problems, Jimenez isn't quite good enough, Stankovic being prone to long lapses in form (well as of last season anyway), Figo getting old... And then there's that little problem of the lack of strike partners for Zlatan.
Speaking after we saw how RQ was, ofc it wasn't worth it..

But I can honestly say it was worth the shot, cause if RQ would hit it off for us and play like he knows, theres not much players in the world at his level.

So no point crying over it now..
Sure, but the disappointing one has only "missed" so far.

60m€ budget out the window.

Thats some accomplishment tbh, not many coaches lack that much feeling about which players will fit a team and which wont.

Im sure you could make a list of players and point 3 players out randomly and do a better job regarding transfer than Mourinho has done this season.
I'm in no way against or for JM. Most of you lot, with you being at the front of the pack, complain but really don't offer solutions to the problems of the club.

I don't know who would we should buy, nor do I know who we should sell. Its very easy for posters on a forum to say we should buy Eto'o or Drogba or Diego or whomever.

The transfer budget is gone, however to be honest I highly doubt we could find help in January, but I understand your fustration. Believe me, I'm fustrated too.

All I want or don't want is a coaching change in the middle of season. I have accepted the fact that Roberto Mancini is gone, and he is partly responsible for his own demise. And in all honestly, if JM is not the answer, I don't think Mancio was either.


But I do ask this question to you, and most Inter fans, do you honestly think JM or any coach could transform this team in one season to CL winner? Enough to topple the Barcas of the world?

Two summer transfer seasons at least, even with the fiasco of last season.


BTW, in regards to Mancini the player, I think he was coming regardless, even if Mancio was still in charge.
See less See more
according to what i read, mancini, before we fired him, wanted guys like hamsik, hleb...i forgot who was another guy he wanted...i believed moratti wanted aquilani...maybe these guys would have been the 'safer' picks...

so i just want to say...perhaps mancini in deciding, dealing and signing new players is better than mourinho in this aspect...at least for us...
according to what i read, mancini, before we fired him, wanted guys like hamsik, hleb...i forgot who was another guy he wanted...i believed moratti wanted aquilani...maybe these guys would have been the 'safer' picks...

so i just want to say...perhaps mancini in deciding, dealing and signing new players is better than mourinho in this aspect...at least for us...
Any one of those players would of been the safer pick, I can't argue that, nor would I intend to.

Again, no arguement in regards to transfers. JM has failed there, and I'm sure he knows it, since he has been really quiet about wanting new players and such.

Aquilani would really look good right now or Montolivo for that matter.

I still maintain we should look to Serie A for help in the future, and outside of Serie A only as a last resort, established players that is.
Any one of those players would of been the safer pick, I can't argue that, nor would I intend to.
I don't see how, Hleb for example is a safer pick. He hasnt done anything at Barca; been injured for a lot of the time. And he cost pretty much a similar amounth to Quaresma.


Anyhow Jose's main failure is implimenting change in the squad. I think after he watched a few of our matches with both RQ and Mancini he realised that we will loose alot of points until the team learned to play with them. And he completly forsaked these two players. RQ has had 12 appearances in the League; while Mancini has had 13 appearances in the league. Both have been pretty bad when played but still 12-13 matches are simply not enough for players to even show form.

We still lack creative options; and I'm damn sure that if RQ gets a run in Chelsea he will start showing the things we bought him for. Problem at Inter is no central midfielder really dictates the tempo; no one really slices through opposition defense and delivers passes into channels for the wingers; Cambo is the closes thing we've got for an attacking midfielder(if ya aint counting Jimenez)
See less See more
Well, when both were dropped in November we went on a 8 match winning streak, so you can't really blame Mourinho.

And yes, this Inter side was in dear need for someone in the mould of Deco. Lampard too would have been quite an addition, goals from midfield a la Matthäus. Oh well..

btw, I read today that Inter now have an option on Drogba if Chelsea decide to offload him, prefer we'd get Deco. Seems he had a good start then declined? I don't think the Premiership suits his style, anyway.
i really hate us going after old dudes...i mean...deco? 32 this year...drogba? 30, 31...something like that..maybe a year younger than deco...they are on the decline...why get them?? it would have been ok for me if we got drogba on loan last month...but next season? hell no...we will have a lot of time to make good deals...good young players available...no need to get old players...
Deco is over the hill imo; shouldnt be any where near the first squad same goes for Ballack(but at least he scores the occasional goal). Deco had about 3 good games at the start of the season; then picked up some injuries and has been shite ever since.
61 - 77 of 77 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top