neville and Carragher

The difference between Carragher and Phil Neville is that Carragher can defend while Neville not. That makes Carragher an ok defender and Neville a crap one. Moreover, I don't define versatily as being able to suck in many positions, which is the case for Phil Neville. Mind you, I don't rate Carragher much because of his spectacular inability to attack or pass the ball (I think he should be a central defender), but he sure as hell is a better player than Neville who has nothing else apart from a common surname with Gary Neville. If that is supposed to be something positive.

Carragher rather than Neville? You trying to make me laugh here?
I think Sven knows what he's doing.

Beechy said:

They both are undervalued by every other fan or club in the world and the only fans that truly recognise them are their own.

Click to expand...

bollox - i'm a man utd fan and think p.neville is ****.

bollox - i'm a man utd fan and think p.neville is ****.

Click to expand...

So is Carragher.

So is Man Utd, but you don't see me going into your forum and telling you that

4 Man U posters in 1 thread......wait a sec, have I entered the Man U forum by mistake?
Let me balance it up a bit
I agree there are rather strange similarities between the two like Beechy pointed out...but honestly, Carragher is far better

Raanan said:

So is Man Utd, but you don't see me going into your forum and telling you that

Click to expand...

well actually.....

i dont think carragher is better than neville for one second. only a liverpool would say that!.... but i guess only a manchester supporter would say neville is better!!


leave it up to the other supporters!!!

still better than xavier but!!