Joined
·
51,200 Posts
Yes it is otherwise good but CB pairing could be better.
Nesta-Thuram maybe?
Nesta-Thuram maybe?
Actually, Rivellino's name is correct. It's written with double L.And about Rivellino... Bocchini... are you re-italianizing their surnames?![]()
I think Zoff could be considered better taking his overall career, but being strict with the parameter of the decade (1970-1979) I'd say that the best goalkeeper was Ubaldo Fillol.Who should i put instead of Zoff? Sepp Maier who suffered goal from same distance, same world.cup same. Shooter?
Baresi would be practically out for the period of time. I'd say that Nesta is a must instead of him.
Much better, for sure.Yes it is otherwise good but CB pairing could be better.
Nesta-Thuram maybe?
Rivellino is obviously correct because the Italian surname is Rivellino and that was what I meant, the way the Italian original of Bochini is Bocchini and I could go on with plenty of examples: Battistutta, Cammoranesi, Bonanno, ... the "problem" with double letters is in South America, not here.Actually, Rivellino's name is correct. It's written with double L.
Rivelino, Rivelinho... they are wrong.
Baresi would be practically out for the period of time. I'd say that Nesta is a must instead of him.
I'd select Thuram over Cafu, gram for gram in general terms.
It's strange to see Busquets in an ideal team of almost 30 years. I'd probably opt for another type of midfield.
Zidane over Iniesta for me in any system.
Cristiano Ronaldo as centre-forward is very out of position. I'd put him on the left and discard Ronaldinho, while Ronaldo would take the attacking center position.
Cafu is like 50 times better than Thuram as a right back.Baresi would be practically out for the period of time. I'd say that Nesta is a must instead of him.
I'd select Thuram over Cafu, gram for gram in general terms.
It's strange to see Busquets in an ideal team of almost 30 years. I'd probably opt for another type of midfield.
Zidane over Iniesta for me in any system.
Cristiano Ronaldo as centre-forward is very out of position. I'd put him on the left and discard Ronaldinho, while Ronaldo would take the attacking center position.
Whats cristiano ronaldo position in Juventus?Baresi would be practically out for the period of time. I'd say that Nesta is a must instead of him.
I'd select Thuram over Cafu, gram for gram in general terms.
It's strange to see Busquets in an ideal team of almost 30 years. I'd probably opt for another type of midfield.
Zidane over Iniesta for me in any system.
Cristiano Ronaldo as centre-forward is very out of position. I'd put him on the left and discard Ronaldinho, while Ronaldo would take the attacking center position.
Romário > Ronaldo fattyBaresi would be practically out for the period of time. I'd say that Nesta is a must instead of him.
I'd select Thuram over Cafu, gram for gram in general terms.
It's strange to see Busquets in an ideal team of almost 30 years. I'd probably opt for another type of midfield.
Zidane over Iniesta for me in any system.
Cristiano Ronaldo as centre-forward is very out of position. I'd put him on the left and discard Ronaldinho, while Ronaldo would take the attacking center position.
I don't understand your point well, but basically the correct writing is not based on the previous origin of the names, but on the legal form in which they have been registered.Rivellino is obviously correct because the Italian surname is Rivellino and that was what I meant, the way the Italian original of Bochini is Bocchini and I could go on with plenty of examples: Battistutta, Cammoranesi, Bonanno, ... the "problem" with double letters is in South America, not here.
Just report if it you want.Stop ruining my thread with stupid discussion or I Will report
I guess it was tongue in cheek (I guess!Just report if it you want.
Don't be offended, but your adjective seems a bit crazy.