[StillLearning]

Cristiano better than Messi

 

[StillLearning]

Di Stéfano way better than Ronaldo fattie

 

[StillLearning]

2 euro.
1 World Cup.
4 UCL.

How about Matthäus?

 

[StillLearning]

Messi was nothing without Xavi and Iniesta.

 

[StillLearning]

Messi average in Argentina is awful.

 

[StillLearning]

Even Neymar for Brazil.scores more than Messi for argentina

 

[StillLearning]

Muahahahahhahahahaha

 

[StillLearning]

Bitch dont kill my vibe

 

[Zico 10]

StillLearning's team went in to half-time 0-1 down.

They refused to accept the scoreline and didn't return for the second half.

 

[constantine jr]

period

 

[ToniSamp]

I knew it would be a failure, he is not humble enough to accept that it might happen that someone else's lineup could be better than his. Which actually means nothing since it is just a game.

 

[Andy Christ]

Yeah as soon as I saw the lineups I knew it will end with him losing in the poll and flipping out .

 

[Glavisted]

Di Stéfano way better than Ronaldo fattie

Generally speaking, no doubt, but the position you placed Di Stéfano is weird and seems to severely reduce his potential (although he started his career as striker, his historical prominence is due to his adaptation as attacking-midfielder/support striker in a central position from which he could cover the entire middle sector).

The best position in your lineup for Di Stéfano would probably be where you put Pelé (there you would have had to decide for one or the other), but there is also another complication related to the style of play. Di Stéfano, in his prime, monopolized the game, he moved throughout the mid-sector to direct the attack and tied the ball and I think that would collide with the style of play of Iniesta and Xavi.

 

[StillLearning]

Generally speaking, no doubt, but the position you placed Di Stéfano is weird and seems to severely reduce his potential (although he started his career as striker, his historical prominence is due to his adaptation as attacking-midfielder/support striker in a central position from which he could cover the entire middle sector).

The best position in your lineup for Di Stéfano would probably be where you put Pelé (there you would have had to decide for one or the other), but there is also another complication related to the style of play. Di Stéfano, in his prime, monopolized the game, he moved throughout the mid-sector to direct the attack and tied the ball and I think that would collide with the style of play of Iniesta and Xavi.

Its obvious

 

[Glavisted]

Its obvious

So, why did you choose that way mate?

 

[StillLearning]

So, why did you choose that way mate?

Coz di Stefano could play anywhere.

 

[Reza]

Got my vote

 

[StillLearning]

Got my vote

 

[Glavisted]

Coz di Stefano could play anywhere.

There is a substantial difference between being able to play anywhere and that the best version of the player appears wherever. This can detract from the player's potential, therefore, the team.

 

[StillLearning]

There is a substantial difference between being able to play anywhere and that the best version of the player appears wherever. This can detract from the player's potential, therefore, the team.

Ok. Replace Pele with Messi. And switch positions