Xtratime Community banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,561 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
NEWS > Home Thursday, 25 May 2006

- AP



FIFA is adopting a new world ranking system.

It's easy to see why.

Under the old scheme, the United States rose to No.4 in April's rankings, its highest-ever position. The eye-popping rise occurred just a few weeks after the Americans were hammered 4-1 by World Cup host Germany.

"Maybe some guys were looking at that ranking a little bit too seriously," American goalkeeper Kasey Keller said after the loss.

The Americans have slipped slightly in the most recent list, the last before the World Cup opens on June 9, into a tie for fifth with Spain.

FIFA's new computer rankings - with new criteria to rate the world's top teams - will be released on July 12, three days after the World Cup ends.

"We don't think it's that bad at all, but there is always room for improvement," FIFA spokesman Andreas Herren said.

How far out of kilter are the present rankings?

Few serious fans would place the Americans in the world's top 10, probably not even the top 15. A spot between 15 and 25 is more realistic.

Under FIFA's present system, five world powers are ranked behind the United States: France (No.8), Argentina (9), England (10), Italy (13) and Germany (19).

Australia lies back in No.42 - which is probably about fair given the overall calibre of recent opponents, although Iran's ranking 19 places above the Socceroos is perhaps a little harsh.

The only teams ranked ahead of the United States in the May rankings were five-time World Cup champion Brazil, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands and Mexico.

Mexico's ranking also raises eyebrows. It probably should be ranked behind the Americans.

In the last 10 games between the two countries, the United States has won seven, including a 2-0 win in the round of 16 in the World Cup four years ago.

Mexico has two victories in that period.

Over a 20-game span - dating back to 1994 - the United States has beaten Mexico nine times, with the Mexicans winning seven. Four were draws.

Under the new ranking system, FIFA will take into account games played over the last four years. Under the old system, it counted results over the last eight, which distorted current form.

Under FIFA's old computer ranking system, explained in 2,750 words on its website, it awarded team ranking points based on the importance of the games - World Cup finals vs. friendly matches, for example - the relative strength of the teams, goals scored and conceded, home or away, etc.

The new system takes into account most of the same factors, but weights them differently.

So why are the Americans and Mexicans so high in the present FIFA rankings?

Under the old system, FIFA gave the most weight to games in the World Cup finals, the continental championships and World Cup qualifiers.

The region in which the United States is grouped, CONCACAF, plays a continental championship every two years. In Europe, it's every four.

In addition, CONCACAF plays almost 50 percent more World Cup qualifiers than the average European country.

Under the new system, FIFA will adjust for these factors - and adjust more for the relatively weak CONCACAF group.

World Cup host Germany, which slipped to No.19, also suffered under the old system. Because it qualified automatically for this World Cup, Germany played no qualifying games.

Egypt, the African Cup of Nations champion, is ranked two spots above Germany. Greece, the defending European champion, Tunisia, Uruguay and Iran are ranked right behind Germany.

In announcing its changes, FIFA assures the new system will be better.

"Transparency and simplicity, the key principles guiding the revision, have been combined with sporting criteria," FIFA said in a statement.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
378 Posts
that's good news, the ranks werent realistic at all.

i mean, the european qualifications are far more difficult then the asian or north and mid-american, so you cant compare it only based on results.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,101 Posts
setareh said:
that's good news, the ranks werent realistic at all.

i mean, the european qualifications are far more difficult then the asian or north and mid-american, so you cant compare it only based on results.
Agree:thumbsup:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
62 Posts
bravo za nasite koi gi postignaa ovie dva dobri posledovatelni rezultati na celo so katanec
samo napred
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
62 Posts
se nadevam deka ke se kacime pogore na ranglista i ke napreduvame
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top