G
Guest
·ROMANIA 0
PORTUGAL 1
A BORING GAME WHICH SHOWED THAT PORTUGAL HAS A LOT OF WORK TO DO IF THEY ARE SERIOUSLY GOING TO CONTEST ANYTHING!
Someone PLEASE explain this to me:
WHY DIDN'T COELHO START CONCEICAO FROM THE BEGINNING?
WHY DIDN'T HE BRING IN PAULETA INSTEAD OF SA PINTO? SA PINTO WAS HORRIBLE!
WAS THE INJURY TO XAVIER THAT SERIOUS THAT HE COULD NOT START? PLEASE GET SECRETARIO OUT OF THE FIELD! HE IS ABSOLUTELY CRAP!
oN A POSITIVE NOTE:
COUTO i MUST ADMIT WAS SOLID IN THE BACK. REALLY NEVER GAVE HIM ANY CREDIT BUT I GUESS HE PROVED ME WRONG.
AS FOR BENTO, WELL I THOUGHT HE WAS SOLID AND DID QUITE WELL.
MY BITC_:
THAT REFEREE FROM fRANCE WAS ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC! TOO MANY WHISTLES WHEN THERE WAS NO NEED FOR A WHISTLE AND WHEN HE NEEDED TO CALL A FOUL HE WAS NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.
[Edited by Ola on 17-06-2000 at 20:18]
PORTUGAL 1
A BORING GAME WHICH SHOWED THAT PORTUGAL HAS A LOT OF WORK TO DO IF THEY ARE SERIOUSLY GOING TO CONTEST ANYTHING!
Someone PLEASE explain this to me:
WHY DIDN'T COELHO START CONCEICAO FROM THE BEGINNING?
WHY DIDN'T HE BRING IN PAULETA INSTEAD OF SA PINTO? SA PINTO WAS HORRIBLE!
WAS THE INJURY TO XAVIER THAT SERIOUS THAT HE COULD NOT START? PLEASE GET SECRETARIO OUT OF THE FIELD! HE IS ABSOLUTELY CRAP!
oN A POSITIVE NOTE:
COUTO i MUST ADMIT WAS SOLID IN THE BACK. REALLY NEVER GAVE HIM ANY CREDIT BUT I GUESS HE PROVED ME WRONG.
AS FOR BENTO, WELL I THOUGHT HE WAS SOLID AND DID QUITE WELL.
MY BITC_:
THAT REFEREE FROM fRANCE WAS ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC! TOO MANY WHISTLES WHEN THERE WAS NO NEED FOR A WHISTLE AND WHEN HE NEEDED TO CALL A FOUL HE WAS NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.
[Edited by Ola on 17-06-2000 at 20:18]