Xtratime Community banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 48 Posts

·
Arsenalation
Joined
·
2,036 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Not that I share the sentiment with you people but here are the latest financial figures.

Chelsea’s latest financial figures revealed the club are £736m in debt with £578m of that owed to Abramovich in an interest-free loan.

One day....it will happen. The karma thing.
 

·
Third Place winner, March 2009 Photo Contest
Joined
·
977 Posts
The Guardian few months ago.

Of course, these look like impressive numbers but at the moment they are quite meaningless. It could possibly change if Abramovich would decide to leave the club but I don't think he bought it with purpose to drive it into financial crisis.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
17,516 Posts
...so chelsea (owned by abramovich) will default on debt owed to abramovich and go bankrupt where the administrators will sell everything and pay abramovich!! somebody close this shit...
 

·
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌&#874
Joined
·
31,893 Posts
Abramovich's loan to Chelsea is as good as putting money into his own business. So no sweat there.

He is the last sugar-daddy that one should worry about. There are many others in the league which are not that sugary.
 

·
Arsenalation
Joined
·
2,036 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
When Abramobitch withdraws his interest, the real Chelsea will return. (I meant the one which struggled to finish 5th every season)

The amount you owe the Russian mafia is staggering...and mafia don't like to give money out freely.

Like I said, Karma. It's already had an effect on that no one talks about chelsea's 2 league titles because they were not won properly; they were bought.
 

·
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌&#874
Joined
·
31,893 Posts
The intentions were clear all along.. that is, to get the best in the business to deal with the business. Kenyon was running ManU well, so he got him. As for Scolari, he is considered the best available.

Why would Abramovich pull out. Kenyon expects breakeven at 2010. it will be profits thereafter and Chelsea, self-sufficient.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,606 Posts
When Abramobitch withdraws his interest, the real Chelsea will return. (I meant the one which struggled to finish 5th every season)

The amount you owe the Russian mafia is staggering...and mafia don't like to give money out freely.

Like I said, Karma. It's already had an effect on that no one talks about chelsea's 2 league titles because they were not won properly; they were bought.
:howler::howler:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,520 Posts
The intentions were clear all along.. that is, to get the best in the business to deal with the business. Kenyon was running ManU well, so he got him. As for Scolari, he is considered the best available.

Why would Abramovich pull out. Kenyon expects breakeven at 2010. it will be profits thereafter and Chelsea, self-sufficient.

I dont think it's as simple as Kenyon reckoning Chelsea will break even in 2010. Somehow I dont think that's possible.
 

·
Honorable Mention, October Photo Contest 2008
Joined
·
2,592 Posts
basically this thread is crap. all clubs that are owned by a sugar daddy are in the same position. if he pulls out ther ****ed. imagine whts going to happen to mancity when thaskin gets fcuked up all those wages with no one to pay them = uh ohhh
 
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top