Three thoughts on the subject:
1) I hate the fact that money turns out to be the single "rethorical" factor that ALWAYS ends up winning an argue/a negotiation.
2) I love when players show addiction, affection and loyalty to their clubs (for example, my own favourite player in my IFK is "Raggarn", 14 seasons for the team). Likewise, I can understand supporters are getting upset over "disloyal" transfers, like the Figo-case (another example: Lucic, a former IFK-player, went as Bosman-di-merda to Bologna. IFK was left without a penny in compensation. Later Lucic returned to Sweden... to AIK, our worst rival).
3) ...but I cannot understand the unbelivable extent to wich the criticizm are drawn! Figo seems to be compared to the Devil now. A spokesman for a Barca supporter club said: "Figo won't be forgiven even by God." Come on, guys! If a player wants to leave for another club, just let him - they are all free men! When it comes down to it, football is a game played for the fun, it's not about good or evil, right or wrong. We really shouldn't be that quick judging people. Barca was given a FORTUNE for Figo, it was not only a fair deal, IT WAS A SPLENDID AFFAIR made by BARCA!
Conclusion: in my point of view, there isn't THAT much to complain about as long as the club is compensated. What we REALLY should fight is the damn Bosman-rule and the players who uses this rule without any second thoughts. Sometimes these players should sit down and think about the many people who worked FOR FREE - and for the love of football -in their mother clubs, during their years as kids.