I hate to see all of this negativity.. We have a good chance at qualifying second if we can pull out of a result against belarus, plus.. who will replace lucescu?
The way I see it is, we had a post in the 2nd minute.. We missed countless number of chances, and we continue our bad luck.
That match could have been another 6-1 game if it werent for all of our misses and Albania's bunker football.
We won the match if we didn't retreat.
PS, there is no way he will play with Cocis over Torje on the right, unless he plays Torje as RB. (Unless he's an idiot of course)
It doesn't matter who will replace Lucescu. He proved he can't do shit and that he has the same fixations Piturca had for Cocis. WTF do all
our coaches see in this mediocre player?
Anyway, Petrescu might do something with even mediocre players, as he did at Unirea. Yeah, now they're well rated because of him, but before him...
Onofras? Bilasco? Had anyone really heard of them as serious contenders for anything before? And they did well, really well in CL. Galamaz who played maybe 10 matches for Dinamo before...
So, Lucescu, with worse opponents and better players (well, I mean, not all of them, but THAT was his choice) got worse results than Petrescu. As such, as coach (not selectioner necessarily), Petrescu is miles above Razvan Lucescu. It would depend on who Petrescu would call... But IMO there's no doubt Petrescu would do more with this squad.
Hagi's presence near those players might in itself lead some of them to learn. Hell, I'd rather play a Hagi who can barely keep up 5' physically than someone like Florescu who can't do SHIT, yet still plays titular.
I mean, Piti had his fixations.... Banel was one of them. But at some point Banel actually showed something, and Banel can be useful against some teams because of his work ethic (even as a royal pain in the ass for opponents... you got a 3m lead but Banel makes it up ASAP... it's still something). Florescu loses the same amount of balls but doesn't give a shit and CAN'T keep up. Codrea at least played in Serie A for years. Florescu is horrible in all aspects. Midjytlland, Vladikawhatever? The ****?
And Boloni... well I dunno, getting fired by some camelmasters ain't pretty, but who knows, maybe he got fired for drinking a glass of wine, a capital sin over there.
So, IMO, whoever replaces Lucescu can be only an improvement. I'm sick and tired of this defensive, back-passing shit that's been plaguing our NT lately. Of course everyone boos them when every ****ing ball goes backwards, when most of the time it's unnecessary.
I'd rather get a 3-4 by a brilliant match where we were just plain dominated than a 1-1 because an idiot decides to retreat and another idiot can't jump high enough. And I'm sorry, it's not Radoi's fault that he plays as CB. There's only one man responsible for THAT.