in your head
Teams: Il club piu ...
Only the first para ... none of the rest. This is what people do not completely understand )and often call me a contrarian as a result). Most of the time, what I do is making sure all options are considered and we dont fall for what seems to be the obvious one. So I am asking questions, stating the possible opposite or different opinions, unraveling the logic behind one or the other stetament. The key is that in that process and most of the time I dont have a firm opinion - i am looking for it. So when I am stating a posisble other or opposite opinion, it doesnt mean i share it. And it certainly doesnt mean that I advocate for what might follow if I share that possible opposite opinion.
In other words, using this example:
- i was saying that it is possible that other fans do not value Silva as high as we (Milan and Serie A fans) do. I have read and seen statements that made me think so. Am I right? How would I know? Its a possible alternative way of looking at Silva as a CB. What followed was a good disucssion, different opinions. Which is my only objective - a discussion, breaking down your firm beliefs in things, considering that you might be wrong, supposing there might be other opinions, planting a seed.
- that I said what I said and considered, is not related in any way to a follow up (let alone, per-meditated) secret goal of mine, namely "you don't trust that you're able to judge a Serie A player fairly due to your bias and that we probably overrate Silva ...". I am not saying that. What I am trying to show is that it is possible that we probably overrate Silva due to bias, but I dont claim that is the situation.